Global Fomesafen Market 2023-2030

    In Stock





    Fomesafen (FSA) is frequently used to suppress weeds in soybean fields. Yet, the persistence of FSA in agricultural soil or water may develop into a covert threat that harms subsequent crops by creating phytotoxicity and environmental contamination. The physiological and growth responses of rice to FSA were examined in this study.


    It was discovered that exposure to FSA, particularly at doses more than 0.1 mg L1, clearly reduced the growth of rice seedlings. In order to fully characterise the biochemical processes and catalytic reactions involved in FSA metabolism in rice, four libraries of rice roots and shoots exposed to FSA were created.


    These libraries were then subjected to global RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) combined with HRLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS analytical technologies.


    Fomesafen belongs to the group of herbicides known as diphenyl ethers, which work to suppress weeds by preventing the plant enzyme protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) from doing its job. An enzyme involved in the synthesis of heme and chlorophyll is interfered with by PPO inhibitors, a herbicide site of action.


    This inhibition triggers a chemical cascade that ultimately results in membrane rupture and lipid peroxidation, which causes the fast deterioration of plant tissues. Due to the quick reaction, there is limited translocation after foliar spray and contact activity results. PPO inhibitors injected into the soil are absorbed by roots and have a constrained upward movement in plants.


    Fomesafen may more frequently result in the chlorosis/necrosis of leaves on crops with labels. Usually, plants recover from this damage without any harmful effects on yield or maturation.




    Infographic: Fomesafen Market, Fomesafen Market Size, Fomesafen Market Trends, Fomesafen Market Forecast, Fomesafen Market Risks, Fomesafen Market Report, Fomesafen Market Share


    The Global Fomesafen Market accounted for $XX Billion in 2022 and is anticipated to reach $XX Billion by 2030, registering a CAGR of XX% from 2023 to 2030.



    In roots and shoots treated with FSA, 499 and 450 up-regulated genes were found in comparison to controls. Many of them had strong relationships with xenobiotic detoxification, tolerance to environmental stress, and molecular metabolism processes like cytochrome P450, glutathione S-transferases, and acetyltransferase.


    HRLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS was used to characterise a total of eight metabolites and fourteen conjugates in the reactive pathways of hydrolysis, substitution, reduction, methylation, glycosylation, acetylation, and malonylation. It was discovered that there is a connection between the metabolised derivatives of FSA and increased expression of the appropriate enzymatic regulators.


    This study will aid in understanding the processes and metabolic pathways of FSA and stimulate additional investigation into the effects of FSA degradation in paddy crops on the environment and human health.


    The ISO common name for an organic substance used as a herbicide is fomesafen. It works by preventing the production of the protoporphyrinogen oxidase enzyme, which is required for the synthesis of chlorophyll. Since glutathione S-transferase disposes of the toxin metabolically, soybeans have a high tolerance to it naturally.


    As a result, soy, various beans, and a few other crop kinds are the most typical crops to receive fomesafen treatment. For maize/corn or other Poaceae, it is unsafe. A selective soil-applied and foliar herbicide called fomesafen is used to control annual broadleaf weeds in soybeans1. The usage of several fomesafen products in dry beans, snap beans, and potatoes is also indicated on the labels.





    1. How many Fomesafen are manufactured per annum globally? Who are the sub-component suppliers in different regions?
    2. Cost breakup of a Global Fomesafen and key vendor selection criteria
    3. Where is it manufactured? What is the Fomesafen Average margin per unit?
    4. Market share of Global Fomesafen Market manufacturers and their upcoming products
    5. Cost advantage for OEMs who manufacture Global Fomesafen In-house
    6. 5 Fomesafen predictions for next 5 years in Global Fiber Laser Engraver market
    7. Average B-2-Fomesafen market price in all segments
    8. Latest trends Fomesafen, by every market segment
    9. The market size (both volume and value) of the Fomesafen market in 2022-2030 and every year in between?
    10.  Production breakup of Fomesafen, by suppliers and their OEM relationship


    Sl no Topic
    1 Market Segmentation
    2 Scope of the report
    3 Abbreviations
    4 Research Methodology
    5 Executive Summary
    6 Introduction
    7 Insights from Industry stakeholders
    8 Cost breakdown of Product by sub-components and average profit margin
    9 Disruptive innovation in the Industry
    10 Technology trends in the Industry
    11 Consumer trends in the industry
    12 Recent Production Milestones
    13 Component Manufacturing in US, EU and China
    14 COVID-19 impact on overall market
    15 COVID-19 impact on Production of components
    16 COVID-19 impact on Point of sale
    17 Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Geography, 2023-2030
    18 Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Product Type, 2023-2030
    19 Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Application, 2023-2030
    20 Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by End use, 2023-2030
    21 Product installation rate by OEM, 2023
    22 Incline/Decline in Average B-2-B selling price in past 5 years
    23 Competition from substitute products
    24 Gross margin and average profitability of suppliers
    25 New product development in past 12 months
    26 M&A in past 12 months
    27 Growth strategy of leading players
    28 Market share of vendors, 2023
    29 Company Profiles
    30 Unmet needs and opportunity for new suppliers
    31 Conclusion
    32 Appendix
      Your Cart
      Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop