
- Get in Touch with Us
Last Updated: Apr 25, 2025 | Study Period: 2024-2030
Currently, fossil fuels are the primary source of energy. Continuous usage of this nonrenewable resource has led to severe environmental issues, which has spurred a lot of research in this century. To solve the present energy and environmental issues, energy storage is essential.
Rechargeable batteries enable energy storage with a smaller footprint than mechanical energy storage. Recent years have seen a boom in research on the interface of rechargeable batteries and nanomaterials, which has led to novel uses for nanomaterials as well as fresh approaches to numerous persistent issues in battery science and technology.
The most promising option for potential lithium ion battery electrodes in the future appears to be nanostructured electrodes. It has also been observed that altering the electrode surface chemistry and managing the right crystallinity can enhance the electrode intercalation capabilities.
The development of thin film electrodes without the addition of binders and conductive carbon that are typically used in the fabrication of conventional lithium ion battery electrodes has also been promoted and is accompanied by the study of appropriately designed nanostructures, interfaces, and crystallinity, which simplifies the electrode fabrication process and increases electrode storage density.
The requirement for the production of three-dimensional ( nanostructured)electrodes is one of the typical difficulties faced by high sensitivity electrochemical biosensors.
Large electroactive surface areas, improved ion and electron transport, good inner and outer surface contact with the analyte, increased material loading per unit substrate area, improved mechanical stability, and good electrochemical sensitivity are just a few of the many benefits of three-dimensional electrodes.
Promising materials for three-dimensional electrochemical biosensors are 3D-materials. On the other hand, using 3D printers to create electrochemical biosensors is a promising approach.
Due to the lack of design limitations, waste minimization, and, most significantly, quick prototyping, 3D printing techniques have been hailed as an amazing technology for the creation of electrochemical devices.
The Global nanostructured electrodes market accounted for $XX Billion in 2022 and is anticipated to reach $XX Billion by 2030, registering a CAGR of XX% from 2024 to 2030.
The most popular transparent electrode in organic photovoltaics (OPVs) is indium tin oxide (ITO), but due to its weak mechanical qualities and limited indium reserves, it is not suited for large-scale OPV manufacturing.
Researchers created, produced, and used plasmonic nanostructured electrodes in inverted OPV devices to replace ITO. They discovered that ZnO thickness greatly impacts the optical field distribution inside the resonant cavity created between the plasmonic nanostructured electrode and top electrode, which affects active layer absorption.
By using nanoimprint lithography, high-quality Cr/Au nanostructured electrodes were created and used in inverted devices on glass without the need of ITO.
According to Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) simulations, devices with thinner ZnO demonstrated a PCE as high as 5.70% and greater JSCs than devices on thicker ZnO.
Additionally, ITO-based devices demonstrated reduced JSC as the active layer was made optically thin, whereas the resonant cavity effect from plasmonic nanostructured electrodes retained JSC.
The plasmonic electrodes and device designs in this work demonstrate potential for creating highly efficient conformable devices that can be utilised for a variety of needs for portable, lightweight power generation.
Sl no | Topic |
1 | Market Segmentation |
2 | Scope of the report |
3 | Abbreviations |
4 | Research Methodology |
5 | Executive Summary |
6 | Introduction |
7 | Insights from Industry stakeholders |
8 | Cost breakdown of Product by sub-components and average profit margin |
9 | Disruptive innovation in the Industry |
10 | Technology trends in the Industry |
11 | Consumer trends in the industry |
12 | Recent Production Milestones |
13 | Component Manufacturing in US, EU and China |
14 | COVID-19 impact on overall market |
15 | COVID-19 impact on Production of components |
16 | COVID-19 impact on Point of sale |
17 | Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Geography, 2024-2030 |
18 | Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Product Type, 2024-2030 |
19 | Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Application, 2024-2030 |
20 | Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by End use, 2024-2030 |
21 | Product installation rate by OEM, 2023 |
22 | Incline/Decline in Average B-2-B selling price in past 5 years |
23 | Competition from substitute products |
24 | Gross margin and average profitability of suppliers |
25 | New product development in past 12 months |
26 | M&A in past 12 months |
27 | Growth strategy of leading players |
28 | Market share of vendors, 2023 |
29 | Company Profiles |
30 | Unmet needs and opportunity for new suppliers |
31 | Conclusion |
32 | Appendix |