Global Plasma Abatement System Market 2022-2030

    Multi User License - $4,500

    In Stock

    Coming soon




    By treating the actual process gas volume a lower and more concentrated volume than what is treated by post-pump abatement units, plasma abatement utilizes less energy.


    In the course of abatement, NOx emissions are reduced to almost nothing thanks to plasma dissociation and the small amount of nitrogen present in the Aeris-G chamber. By functioning “on-demand,” the Aeris-G unit lowers operating expenses compared to continuous, energy-guzzling operation after pump abatement.


    Plasma Abatement System Market, Plasma Abatement System Market Size, Plasma Abatement System Market Trends, Plasma Abatement System Market Forecast, Plasma Abatement System Market Risks, Plasma Abatement System Market Report, Plasma Abatement System Market Share


    The pump footprint of each chamber can accommodate the installation of the Aeris-G system. It readily fits into existing exhaust lines and just needs connections for power, nitrogen, cooling water, and ultrapure water, making it perfect for current tool installations.


    Aeris-G decreases utility and exhaust connections, subfab area requirements, and installation costs for new tool installations while increasing abatement effectiveness.


    The global warming gases CF4 and C4F8 can be effectively eliminated using the plasma abatement technology. In order to drastically reduce air pollution, it is essential to destroy greenhouse gases, notably perfluoro compounds, hydro fluoro compounds, chloro fluoro compounds, and SF6.


    An abatement system for chemicals produced in semiconductor processes is one of the embodiments.  A plasma source with a first plate and a second plate that are parallel to the first plate is part of the abatement system.


    Between the first and second plates is an electrode, and the electrode is surrounded by an outer wall that is positioned between the first and second plates.


    The first plurality of magnets is placed on the first plate of the plasma source, and a second plurality is placed on the second plate.


    The electric field formed between the electrode and the outside wall is essentially parallel to the magnetic field produced by the first and second pluralities of magnets. This arrangement results in the formation of dense plasma.





    The Global Plasma abatement system market accounted for $XX Billion in 2021 and is anticipated to reach $XX Billion by 2030, registering a CAGR of XX% from 2022 to 2030.



    The Sirius 6000 abatement system from Edwards, a provider of vacuum and abatement equipment and services, solves the issues of greenhouse gas abatement brought on by dielectric and polysilicon etch operations.


    According to the manufacturer, the system is designed to reduce fab greenhouse gas emissions by up to 95% over a broad range of total flow rates and perfluoro compound (PFC) concentrations. It does this by utilizing an energy-efficient microwave plasma in a meticulously controlled chemical environment and an integrated wet scrubber.


    Etch procedures are now the main sources of PFC emissions as a result of the switch from conventional PFC gasses to nitrogen fluoride remote plasma cleaning for chemical vapor deposition chambers. This problem is explicitly addressed by the new Sirius 6000 system.


    A recently created atmospheric plasma abatement system can be used to clean a chamber and reduce emissions from a single oxide etcher tool. At the maximum power of 5.9 kW, an optimized microwave plasma cavity can treat up to 80 L/min of CF/sub 4 exhaust with 95% DRE. The flow rate range for this system is 40 L/min to 80 L/min.


    By treating the actual process gas volume, which is a smaller and more concentrated amount than what is treated by post-pump abatement systems, the Applied Aeris-G system is a pre-pump plasma abatement solution that uses less energy. When opposed to energy-hungry, continuous running after pump abatement, the Aeris-G unit functions “on-demand,” considerably lowering operating expenses.


    A new batch of orders for CS CLEAN SYSTEMS’ CLEANSORB dry bed abatement systems has been announced. The most recent systems will soon be delivered to research institutions and manufacturing businesses that have just ordered new Oxford Plasma Technology machinery.


    Six CLEANSORB dry bed absorbers will be delivered in total, adding to the substantial foundation of CLEANSORB systems already present on Oxford Plasma Technology RIE and PECVD instruments. Using a Plasmalab 133 system to produce nitride and oxide photovoltaic thin films, waste gasses silane (SiH4) and ammonia (NH3) must be safely removed.


    Etching of III-V structures for Optoelectronic R&D, requiring waste gas treatment of poisonous phosphine and arsine in addition to the by-products of the gallium and indium chloride etch;


    Two customers are using Oxford Plasma Technology systems for Deep Silicon MEMS Etch, where dry scrubbers will absorb the hazardous and damaging fluoride byproducts; PECVD of silicon nitride (SiN) and silicon oxide (SiO) for biosensors; and SiO via hole etching for Si integrated circuits using a Plasmalab 800 Plus system.


    In Poland, Italy, and Germany, the new technologies will be put into operation at research centers and small production enterprises. The lab-scale CLEANSORB devices will be used for a variety of applications, such as, Due to its maintenance-free operation and lack of handling of hazardous by-products by laboratory workers, CLEANSORB dry bed absorber technology has become the preferred waste gas abatement option for RIE and PECVD users.


    In R&D and pilot-scale settings, the refillable column’s absorbing lifetime often goes well beyond a year. The system is always on standby and doesn’t need to be started up or shut down in order to run because it doesn’t need any fuel, energy, or water.


    This abatement technique treats PFC gas, which is hardly decomposable, using atmospheric pressure plasma. uses direct current plasma to create high temperatures to treat and degrade PFC gas (SF6, CF4, etc.), which is challenging to do so under normal circumstances.


    CF4, halogen gas, SiH4, TEOS, and by-product fluorine gas are examples of difficult-to-decompose gasses that can be treated simultaneously in one system. CF4 and halogen gas can be treated by this abatement system, which just requires energy and water. This abatement system may also treat fluorine-based gas that develops as a by-product of decomposition using an integrated scrubber.





    1. What is the average cost per Global Plasma abatement system market right now and how will it change in the next 5-6 years?
    2. Average cost to set up a Global Plasma abatement system market in the US, Europe and China?
    3. How many Global Plasma abatement system markets are manufactured per annum globally? Who are the sub-component suppliers in different regions?
    4. What is happening in the overall public, globally?
    5. Cost breakup of a Global Plasma abatement system market and key vendor selection criteria
    6. Where is the Global Plasma abatement system market  manufactured? What is the average margin per equipment?
    7. Market share of Global Plasma abatement system market manufacturers and their upcoming products
    8. The most important planned Global Plasma abatement system market in next 2 years
    9. Details on network of major Global Plasma abatement system market and pricing plans
    10. Cost advantage for OEMs who manufacture Global Plasma abatement system market in-house
    11. 5 key predictions for next 5 years in Global Plasma abatement system market
    12. Average B-2-B Global Plasma abatement system market price in all segments
    13. Latest trends in Global Plasma abatement system market, by every market segment
    14. The market size (both volume and value) of Global Plasma abatement system market in 2022-2030 and every year in between?
    15. Global production breakup of Global Plasma abatement system market, by suppliers and their OEM relationship
    Sl no Topic
    1 Market Segmentation
    2 Scope of the report
    3 Abbreviations
    4 Research Methodology
    5 Executive Summary
    6 Introduction
    7 Insights from Industry stakeholders
    8 Cost breakdown of Product by sub-components and average profit margin
    9 Disruptive innovation in the Industry
    10 Technology trends in the Industry
    11 Consumer trends in the industry
    12 Recent Production Milestones
    13 Component Manufacturing in US, EU and China
    14 COVID-19 impact on overall market
    15 COVID-19 impact on Production of components
    16 COVID-19 impact on Point of sale
    17 Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Geography, 2022-2030
    18 Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Product Type, 2022-2030
    19 Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Application, 2022-2030
    20 Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by End use, 2022-2030
    21 Product installation rate by OEM, 2022
    22 Incline/Decline in Average B-2-B selling price in past 5 years
    23 Competition from substitute products
    24 Gross margin and average profitability of suppliers
    25 New product development in past 12 months
    26 M&A in past 12 months
    27 Growth strategy of leading players
    28 Market share of vendors, 2022
    29 Company Profiles
    30 Unmet needs and opportunity for new suppliers
    31 Conclusion
    32 Appendix


      Your Cart
      Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop