
- Get in Touch with Us
Last Updated: Apr 25, 2025 | Study Period: 2024-2030
Conducted RF Immunity Testing is a type of EMC test where the EUT is put through a series of cables while being exposed to varying amounts of radio frequency EMI stress to see if it has any effects on how it functions.
Immunity to radio frequency (RF). RF immunity testing's goal is to put a product through a controlled RF stress that simulates the level that might be present in its working environment, over a frequency range that is mostly determined by practical considerations and experience with real-world issues.
Tests for radiation immunity determine how susceptible your gadget is. Your device might be impacted by emissions from nearby devices. For instance, if you produce phones, you should be aware of any potential risks posed by surrounding devices' emissions.
The system's ability to function properly in the presence of an electromagnetic field created outside is determined by its radiative susceptibility.
The terms "radiated susceptibility test" and "radiated immunity test" are interchangeable. In the presence of a fluctuating electromagnetic field, a conductor is forced to produce a current.
By moving the equipment to a remote location, a radio frequency test is carried out on it. To reduce electromagnetic interference with the equipment, the region is managed.
Following that, the gadget is extensively scrutinized for any emissions that might affect the performance of nearby devices. The diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases frequently involves the use of an RF test. It is also possible to comprehend via RF testing.
The Global RF Immunity Test System market accounted for $XX Billion in 2023 and is anticipated to reach $XX Billion by 2030, registering a CAGR of XX% from 2024 to 2030.
Grey algorithms Private LimitedAccording to the RF immunity standard IEC-61000-4-3, the test distance between the antenna's tip and the equipment being tested must be 3 meters (DUT).
In the EMC field, a place like this with a consistent field is referred to as a quiet zone. When the DUT is placed in the calm zone for immunity testing, a specific amount of E-field is applied to it.
To make sure that any interconnecting cables to the DUT are partially lighted by the field, the region of uniform lighting is 1.5 by 1.5 meters. When 75% of the 12 locations here adhere to the 0 to +6 dB criterion, the field is declared uniform.
Many different parts make up a standard radiated immunity (RI) test setup, including antennas, an amplifier, a signal generator, power meters, directional couplers, and an E-field probe.
A typical RI configuration in accordance with IEC 61000-4-3 is shown in . The DUT is positioned 3m distant from the antenna tip on the turntable inside the chamber [1].
Long lines of RF cables are typically utilized to connect the dual directional coupler (DDC) input, feed-through connection on the chamber wall, and amplifier output. The feed-through connector on the chamber wall connects to the antenna input.
Sl no | Topic |
1 | Market Segmentation |
2 | Scope of the report |
3 | Abbreviations |
4 | Research Methodology |
5 | Executive Summary |
6 | Introduction |
7 | Insights from Industry stakeholders |
8 | Cost breakdown of Product by sub-components and average profit margin |
9 | Disruptive innovation in the Industry |
10 | Technology trends in the Industry |
11 | Consumer trends in the industry |
12 | Recent Production Milestones |
13 | Component Manufacturing in US, EU and China |
14 | COVID-19 impact on overall market |
15 | COVID-19 impact on Production of components |
16 | COVID-19 impact on Point of sale |
17 | Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Geography, 2024-2030 |
18 | Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Product Type, 2024-2030 |
19 | Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by Application, 2024-2030 |
20 | Market Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast by End use, 2024-2030 |
21 | Product installation rate by OEM, 2023 |
22 | Incline/Decline in Average B-2-B selling price in past 5 years |
23 | Competition from substitute products |
24 | Gross margin and average profitability of suppliers |
25 | New product development in past 12 months |
26 | M&A in past 12 months |
27 | Growth strategy of leading players |
28 | Market share of vendors, 2023 |
29 | Company Profiles |
30 | Unmet needs and opportunity for new suppliers |
31 | Conclusion |
32 | Appendix |