By submitting this form, you are agreeing to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Streaming video encoder is a device or software program used to encode digital video for streaming on the internet.
It takes input from various sources such as a digital camera, DVD player or other digital video source and converts it into a format suitable for streaming over the internet.
The encoded video is then sent over the internet to the streaming server which can then be viewed by users on their computers or mobile devices.
A streaming video encoder can be used for both live streaming and on-demand streaming. For live streaming, the encoder device captures the video in real-time and encodes it into a format suitable for streaming.
On-demand streaming is when the video is first encoded and stored on the streaming server, and then streamed to users when they request it.
The most common formats for streaming video encoders are MPEG-2, H.264 and H.265. Each of these formats have their own advantages and disadvantages.
MPEG-2 is the most common format used for streaming video, as it is widely supported by all streaming media players.
H.264 is more efficient and offers better video quality, but is not as widely supported as MPEG-2. H.265 is the newest format and offers the best video quality, but requires more computing power to encode.
Streaming video encoders can also be used to compress the video before streaming. This helps to reduce the file size and bandwidth needed for streaming, allowing more people to watch the video at the same time.
The encoder can also be used to add metadata to the video, such as titles and descriptions, as well as other features such as captions and watermarks.
Streaming video encoders are essential for anyone wanting to stream video online. They are used in a variety of applications, from streaming live events to delivering on-demand videos to viewers.
They are also an important part of any streaming service, as they are used to encode and compress the video before streaming.
The Global Streaming Video Encoder market accounted for $XX Billion in 2022 and is anticipated to reach $XX Billion by 2030, registering a CAGR of XX% from 2024 to 2030.
Atomos’ Shogun Studio 4K, a powerful and affordable 4K/HD 10-bit video recording, editing, and streaming product, brings the power of 4K to your fingertips.
This user-friendly unit comes with a 4K/HD 10-bit recording and playback device, a full-featured monitor, and a professional-grade video I/O breakout box.
You can easily stream video to broadcast-quality 4K/HD resolution using the included Atomos Connect converter.
Shogun Studio 4K enables you to record, edit, and stream your content all in one place.
For a fraction of the cost of traditional broadcasting solutions, you get maximum flexibility and uncompromising quality. Atomos is a professional video production solution that is ultra-portable.
Matrox Monarch HD is a high-performance and versatile standalone H.264 encoder for professional streaming.
Monarch HD captures an HD or SD source, encodes it to industry-standard H.264, and streams it out to content delivery networks (CDNs) or streaming servers, making it ideal for delivering live events, lectures, and presentations.
Its simple web interface and integrated scheduler make it simple to set up and manage streaming sessions. Matrox provides the ideal combination of performance and value.
MediaKind’s innovative GPU-based Video-Encoding Technology: A triple win for customers.MediaKind’s breakthrough new range of GPU-acceleration encoding cards is poised to achieve the holy trinity of video creation: greater broadcast quality, huge cost savings, and significantly enhanced ESG (environment-society-governance) scores.
When compared to CPU-based encoding techniques, tests have shown up to 70% energy savings. When a 48-channel CPU-only deployment is compared to a GPU-based server deployment, the total cost of ownership (TCO) is reduced by up to $200k over 5 years.
This also saves about 50 tonnes of CO2e, which is the equivalent of 100 flights from Paris to New York.
The innovative GPU-based solution is a triple win for enterprises since it significantly lowers operational costs, significantly reduces energy usage, and significantly lowers capital expenditures while keeping high standards in important areas like rack density and picture quality.
It presents a strong business case for clients who want to accomplish sustainability targets without sacrificing even the slightest bit of performance.
Typically, video encoding consumes up to one-third of the computer power in a typical datacenter, making it one of the most power-hungry operations.
For the industry, maintaining a balance between cost control and high-quality performance while limiting carbon dioxide emissions has proven to be a significant difficulty.
By optimising energy use and lowering emissions during the video streaming process, MediaKind’s new proprietary technology is tackling this problem head-on and enabling significantly more “green” video production.
However, in order to appreciate why MediaKind’s GPU video encoding technology outperforms CPU-based encoding, we must first understand the key differences between a CPU and a GPU.
A Central Processing Unit (CPU) is a generalist component that handles all of a computer’s basic functions, whereas a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) is a specialised component that excels at running numerous smaller jobs at the same time.
GPUs can handle much more concurrent mathematical and geographical operations than CPUs since they have many more cores.
This means that GPUs are better suited for complex processing tasks like video encoding, where many little operations must be executed concurrently.
GPU-accelerated computing, or employing a GPU in addition to a CPU, enables better video playback with real-time accelerated effects and transitions without needing to draw them individually. The finished product is much better than those that only use CPU power.
The server’s primary CPU(s) can now be used for more general workloads thanks to MediaKind’s GPU video encoding technology, which also offers up to 70% energy savings over CPU-based encoding.
The total cost of ownership (TCO) metric was shown to be reduced by up to $200,000 over five years in tests comparing a 48-channel CPU-only deployment with a GPU-based server deployment.
The solution also offers savings of up to 65% on encoding servers, making it suitable for enterprises wishing to optimise their data centre architecture.
It minimises cooling requirements and associated costs by using less power – the comparable power per channel metric was as low as 13W for an IPTV HD channel (30FPS) and 78W for a UHD OTT profile (60FPS).
Customers may install MediaKind’s GPU-based solution without requiring any complicated implementation, and it fully supports the H.264 and HEVC codecs.
Additionally, customers have the option to supply their own servers, eliminating the need for custom hardware.
The solution may be installed on their own servers, and they can administer the channels using the same intuitive MediaKind interface and licensing scheme.
Customers have no choice but to invest in this technology because MediaKind clearly distinguishes itself as the most feasible alternative in a fiercely competitive market by consuming significantly less power and continuously delivering greater levels of production than its competitors.
